↓ Skip to main content

Ultralight Fractal Structures from Hollow Tubes

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Ultralight Fractal Structures from Hollow Tubes
Published in
Physical Review Letters, November 2012
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.109.204301
Authors

Daniel Rayneau-Kirkhope, Yong Mao, Robert Farr

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 6%
Brazil 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
China 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 69 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 30%
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 29 37%
Physics and Astronomy 28 35%
Materials Science 8 10%
Unspecified 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#786,853
of 13,205,256 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#3,107
of 26,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,687
of 254,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#147
of 1,862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,205,256 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.