↓ Skip to main content

Weighted networks as randomly reinforced urn processes

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Weighted networks as randomly reinforced urn processes
Published in
Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, February 2013
DOI 10.1103/physreve.87.020106
Authors

Guido Caldarelli, Alessandro Chessa, Irene Crimaldi, Fabio Pammolli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 11%
Belgium 1 6%
Unknown 15 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 39%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 8 44%
Social Sciences 3 17%
Mathematics 2 11%
Computer Science 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 3 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2013.
All research outputs
#3,168,198
of 4,505,030 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
#2,352
of 5,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,252
of 89,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,030 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.