↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of Controllability in Interbank Networks

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Evolution of Controllability in Interbank Networks
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep01626
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danilo Delpini, Stefano Battiston, Massimo Riccaboni, Giampaolo Gabbi, Fabio Pammolli, Guido Caldarelli

Abstract

The Statistical Physics of Complex Networks has recently provided new theoretical tools for policy makers. Here we extend the notion of network controllability to detect the financial institutions, i.e. the drivers, that are most crucial to the functioning of an interbank market. The system we investigate is a paradigmatic case study for complex networks since it undergoes dramatic structural changes over time and links among nodes can be observed at several time scales. We find a scale-free decay of the fraction of drivers with increasing time resolution, implying that policies have to be adjusted to the time scales in order to be effective. Moreover, drivers are often not the most highly connected "hub" institutions, nor the largest lenders, contrary to the results of other studies. Our findings contribute quantitative indicators which can support regulators in developing more effective supervision and intervention policies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 3%
Switzerland 2 3%
Mexico 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 68 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 30%
Researcher 20 25%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Unspecified 6 8%
Other 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 16%
Computer Science 12 15%
Physics and Astronomy 11 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 13%
Unspecified 9 11%
Other 24 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2013.
All research outputs
#5,737,258
of 11,393,001 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#18,136
of 48,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,876
of 130,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#206
of 453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,393,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.