↓ Skip to main content

Entropic equality for worst-case work at any protocol speed

Overview of attention for article published in New Journal of Physics, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Entropic equality for worst-case work at any protocol speed
Published in
New Journal of Physics, February 2017
DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/aa62ba
Authors

Oscar C O Dahlsten, Mahn-Soo Choi, Daniel Braun, Andrew J P Garner, Nicole Yunger Halpern, Vlatko Vedral

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Vietnam 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 37%
Researcher 6 32%
Student > Master 4 21%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 19 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2017.
All research outputs
#5,233,898
of 9,771,303 outputs
Outputs from New Journal of Physics
#1,341
of 3,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,166
of 263,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Journal of Physics
#31
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,771,303 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,490 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.