↓ Skip to main content

Mean grain diameters from thin sections: matching the average to the problem

Overview of attention for article published in Mineralogical Magazine, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Mean grain diameters from thin sections: matching the average to the problem
Published in
Mineralogical Magazine, January 2018
DOI 10.1180/minmag.2016.080.107
Authors

Rozbert S. Farr, Victoria C. Honour, Marian B. Holness

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 35%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 47%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#17,890,958
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Mineralogical Magazine
#639
of 782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,985
of 441,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mineralogical Magazine
#86
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 782 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.