↓ Skip to main content

Mean grain diameters from thin sections: matching the average to the problem

Overview of attention for article published in Mineralogical Magazine, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Mean grain diameters from thin sections: matching the average to the problem
Published in
Mineralogical Magazine, January 2018
DOI 10.1180/minmag.2016.080.107
Authors

Robert S. Farr, Victoria C. Honour, Marian B. Holness

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 50%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 60%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Chemical Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#10,452,436
of 13,708,810 outputs
Outputs from Mineralogical Magazine
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,297
of 263,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mineralogical Magazine
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,708,810 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.