↓ Skip to main content

What you see is not what you get: how sampling affects macroscopic features of biological networks

Overview of attention for article published in Interface Focus, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
What you see is not what you get: how sampling affects macroscopic features of biological networks
Published in
Interface Focus, December 2011
DOI 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0050
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Annibale, A. C. C. Coolen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 9%
Japan 2 6%
Spain 1 3%
France 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 24 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 25%
Researcher 8 25%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 25%
Physics and Astronomy 7 22%
Mathematics 5 16%
Unspecified 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#9,205,406
of 11,500,624 outputs
Outputs from Interface Focus
#203
of 263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,845
of 290,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Interface Focus
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,500,624 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.