@paulg Doyne Farmer's (@INETOxford, @sfiscience) work and @stevenstrogatz famous Romeo & Juliet Love Affair can guide you. https://t.co/nmkTTR29q7
@Leigh_Phillips I think all your arguments make sense in that they illustrate what advantages of nukes could be. But there is a fundamental problem of nuke-ren incompatibility. Then, you should pay attention to cost reduction potential, and this is massive
@BoToBeAl1 @synth_ethics Que pensez vous de ces articles scientifiques ? Sont-ils le fait d'astrologues ? https://t.co/FONvFrWXIt https://t.co/iPAn5vKLKh https://t.co/1ZKi0ktmjf Je vous conseille de lire le dernier, particulièrement intéressant, car ayant
Also while obvioulsy backward looking many technologies have actually stayed very close to a particular learning rate over a pretty decent amount of scale increase so it's not crazy to think you could do a reasonable job here. https://t.co/2q0DCT40Jw https
@Down_Ra226 @JulienDelRio @EcoSceptique Càd qu'en investissant plus dans les ENR ont les rend beaucoup plus productives qu'en investissant dans le nucléaire (cf par ex https://t.co/tTSKncJiBj , mais attention je dis pas qu'il faut arrêter le nucléaire ), e
@Phanto17 Les courbes de coût À moyen terme le nucléaire ne semble pas si intéressant. Aujourd'hui c'est de loin ce qu'on a de mieux, mais en investissant dans d'autres moyens on pousse énormément leur prix vers le bas https://t.co/tTSKnd0TsR
@paulg Their conclusion is that technology ALWAYS makes things cheaper over time. At different rates, but always cheaper. So that makes us wealthier over time. It is self-evident, but it has profound implications. https://t.co/OfAxRCHTGl
@SolarCoin_SLR Posted... https://t.co/TcAauUp3tG
RT @SolarCoin_SLR: How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/Qx7UruHJLZ
How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/Qx7UruHJLZ
RT @lykke: #FF @richardbolsen Lykke's founder and CEO Richard Olsen is often considered to be a visionary for his bold ideas and innovativ…
RT @lykke: #FF @richardbolsen Lykke's founder and CEO Richard Olsen is often considered to be a visionary for his bold ideas and innovativ…
RT @lykke: #FF @richardbolsen Lykke's founder and CEO Richard Olsen is often considered to be a visionary for his bold ideas and innovativ…
#FF @richardbolsen Lykke's founder and CEO Richard Olsen is often considered to be a visionary for his bold ideas and innovative leadership. A good pick for #followfriday if you're interested in new technologies, #fintech and #blockchain.
The speed of technological innovation in many disciplines is close to Moore’s law of computers. Society will change beyond recognition in 10 years. This is a huge opportunity. https://t.co/nRTqHKErve
@LukasThoms If you alter payoffs (through pigouvian subsidies or regulatory restrictions) you can obviously speed or slow adoption or development of new tech, but that's a claim that's not actually backed up by the evidence: https://t.co/vLV2K3CeLn
@chrispydog 1/ I don't think "belief" has anything useful to do with energy policy: I was copying your phrasing. I refer you to the work of Doyne Farmer "How predictable is technological progress?" https://t.co/zJaIGtbK3p and invite you to consider more d
@ramez @paolobacigalupi @AlexSteffen Do you know Farmer's et al.'s paper on the predictability of tech progress? https://t.co/xI4DUexy6l
@Saroumane38 ... désolé pour cet oubli ... https://t.co/lgDmB6LSfH
RT @C4COMPUTATION: SFI's Farmer & Lafond use hind-casting to assess if current technological progress was predictable from past trends http…
SFI's Farmer & Lafond use hind-casting to assess if current technological progress was predictable from past trends https://t.co/o0D5St2oWN https://t.co/zCIiOvpV2l
How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/A70xgnbSbZ Detailed paper on hindcasting authors have looked at 53 technologies
Just found this very well researched article about predicting technology. Picked out two graphs that say it all. https://t.co/Xd8AQ4QveT https://t.co/yKqhO6U3Tn
RT @cdelancray: How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/SN3o5ayTJB cc @timoreilly cc @wadhwa #technology #innovation #2MA h…
A very interesting article indeed! Thanks @MaxCRoser for bringing it to my attention. #Technology #Progress #Predictability #Oxford #Science https://t.co/J1beEkMZsB
RT @cdelancray: How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/SN3o5ayTJB cc @timoreilly cc @wadhwa #technology #innovation #2MA h…
RT @cdelancray: How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/SN3o5ayTJB cc @timoreilly cc @wadhwa #technology #innovation #2MA h…
RT @cdelancray: How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/SN3o5ayTJB cc @timoreilly cc @wadhwa #technology #innovation #2MA h…
RT @cdelancray: How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/SN3o5ayTJB cc @timoreilly cc @wadhwa #technology #innovation #2MA h…
RT @cdelancray: How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/SN3o5ayTJB cc @timoreilly cc @wadhwa #technology #innovation #2MA h…
RT @cdelancray: How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/SN3o5ayTJB cc @timoreilly cc @wadhwa #technology #innovation #2MA h…
RT @cdelancray: How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/SN3o5ayTJB cc @timoreilly cc @wadhwa #technology #innovation #2MA h…
RT @cdelancray: How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/SN3o5ayTJB cc @timoreilly cc @wadhwa #technology #innovation #2MA h…
How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/SN3o5ayTJB cc @timoreilly cc @wadhwa #technology #innovation #2MA https://t.co/1cZuY7idK1
RT @teppofelin: Oxford's Doyne Farmer and Francois Lafond on "How predictable is technological progress?" https://t.co/nJE0RfL4Kk https://t…
RT @teppofelin: Oxford's Doyne Farmer and Francois Lafond on "How predictable is technological progress?" https://t.co/nJE0RfL4Kk https://t…
RT teppofelin: Oxford's Doyne Farmer and Francois Lafond on "How predictable is technological progress?" https://t.co/PelVVW7KDx …
@nemoredux You will like this. https://t.co/nPgojNxFns
@ramez Have a look https://t.co/VFjrvmwW42
RT @HirokiSayama: Farmer & Lafond (2016) How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/ufspcAPHn4 #ccs16 #ccs2016 @CCS2016_AMS
RT @alltbl: Reading Hiroki's massive tweets and knowing Doyne was there, I've begun to feel that I am missing something great,…
Improved technological forecasting based on historical data rather than expert opinion. Great read! #solarenergy https://t.co/RyXQqCXPJd
Reading Hiroki's massive tweets and knowing Doyne was there, I've begun to feel that I am missing something great,,,,,, https://t.co/Gu1UTLt3uT
Farmer & Lafond (2016) How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/ufspcAPHn4 #ccs16 #ccs2016 @CCS2016_AMS
RT @robertoglezcano: How predictable is technological progress? by @sciencedirect https://t.co/x55DybR8KX #tech #energy #datascience https:…
RT @robertoglezcano: How predictable is technological progress? by @sciencedirect https://t.co/x55DybR8KX #tech #energy #datascience https:…
RT @robertoglezcano: How predictable is technological progress? by @sciencedirect https://t.co/x55Dyc8JCv #tech #datascience #energy https:…
RT @robertoglezcano: How predictable is technological progress? by @sciencedirect https://t.co/x55Dyc8JCv #tech #datascience #energy https:…
RT @robertoglezcano: How predictable is technological progress? by @sciencedirect https://t.co/x55Dyc8JCv #tech #datascience #energy https:…
How predictable is technological progress? by @sciencedirect https://t.co/x55Dyc8JCv #tech #datascience #energy https://t.co/FCwZ9ZspP3
RT @robertoglezcano: How predictable is technological progress? by @sciencedirect https://t.co/x55DybR8KX #tech #energy #datascience https:…
RT @robertoglezcano: How predictable is technological progress? by @sciencedirect https://t.co/x55DybR8KX #tech #energy #datascience https:…
RT @robertoglezcano: How predictable is technological progress? by @sciencedirect https://t.co/x55DybR8KX #tech #energy #datascience https:…
RT @robertoglezcano: How predictable is technological progress? by @sciencedirect https://t.co/x55DybR8KX #tech #energy #datascience https:…
How predictable is technological progress? - https://t.co/pDXIf19QEU https://t.co/aY6LGGtOcH
MT @wadhwa: An academic, data-driven take on technological progress. Yes, exponential https://t.co/bR4Ey6dtA8 https://t.co/0KWolO5e5p
RT @robertoalvarez: A Lei de Moore em varios dominios tecnologicos: leitura obrigatoria!! https://t.co/CZgNP2Omu0 #tecnologia #exponencial…
RT @robertoglezcano: How predictable is technological progress? by @sciencedirect https://t.co/x55DybR8KX #tech #energy #datascience https:…
An interesting question; see one studied response. RT @MoHossain: How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/yEKeyQDoIP
RT @sergiogugel: #research How predictable is #technology and technological progress? https://t.co/BXwvOxADir
#research How predictable is #technology and technological progress? https://t.co/BXwvOxADir
How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/ifliYjqyNS [Interesting paper]
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @robertoglezcano: How predictable is technological progress? by @sciencedirect https://t.co/x55DybR8KX #tech #energy #datascience https:…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @rameshmashelkar: How predictable is #technological #progress? https://t.co/4VcWZ2WAd9
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @rameshmashelkar: How predictable is #technological #progress? https://t.co/4VcWZ2WAd9
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
How predictable is #technological #progress? https://t.co/4VcWZ2WAd9
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
"Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/5N4HS1LfhH cc @ramez https://t.co/bkMkQbr1VI
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @cdelancray: "Especially in technology, we need revolutionary change, not incremental change." https://t.co/2KHQeOHoO2 cc @ramez https:/…
RT @wadhwa: An academic, data-driven take on technological progress. Yes, exponential. https://t.co/mJ9AlBLMQC https://t.co/UxkbX24cO4
How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/VLKW5DxT47
How predictable is technological progress? https://t.co/CivX8BpohK
RT @wadhwa: An academic, data-driven take on technological progress. Yes, exponential. https://t.co/mJ9AlBLMQC https://t.co/UxkbX24cO4
RT @wadhwa: An academic, data-driven take on technological progress. Yes, exponential. https://t.co/mJ9AlBLMQC https://t.co/UxkbX24cO4