↓ Skip to main content

Entropic equality for worst-case work at any protocol speed

Overview of attention for article published in New Journal of Physics, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Entropic equality for worst-case work at any protocol speed
Published in
New Journal of Physics, April 2017
DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/aa62ba
Authors

Oscar C O Dahlsten, Mahn-Soo Choi, Daniel Braun, Andrew J P Garner, Nicole Yunger Halpern, Vlatko Vedral

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 23 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,684,589
of 12,371,261 outputs
Outputs from New Journal of Physics
#1,227
of 4,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,762
of 226,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Journal of Physics
#36
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,371,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.