↓ Skip to main content

Photonic Maxwell’s Demon

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
35 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Photonic Maxwell’s Demon
Published in
Physical Review Letters, February 2016
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.116.050401
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mihai D. Vidrighin, Oscar Dahlsten, Marco Barbieri, M. S. Kim, Vlatko Vedral, Ian A. Walmsley

Abstract

We report an experimental realization of Maxwell's demon in a photonic setup. We show that a measurement at the few-photons level followed by a feed-forward operation allows the extraction of work from intense thermal light into an electric circuit. The interpretation of the experiment stimulates the derivation of an equality relating work extraction to information acquired by measurement. We derive a bound using this relation and show that it is in agreement with the experimental results. Our work puts forward photonic systems as a platform for experiments related to information in thermodynamics.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 171 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 31%
Researcher 40 22%
Student > Master 25 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Professor 12 7%
Other 37 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 143 78%
Unspecified 13 7%
Engineering 10 5%
Chemistry 6 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 9 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#217,530
of 12,830,933 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#790
of 26,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,658
of 250,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#25
of 529 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,830,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 529 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.