| Title |
Robustness and assortativity for diffusion-like processes in scale-free networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EPL (Europhysics Letters), March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1209/0295-5075/97/68006 |
| Authors |
G. D'Agostino, A. Scala, V. Zlatić, G. Caldarelli |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 5 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 28% |
| Researcher | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 15 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 18% |
| Engineering | 7 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2012.
All research outputs
#15,548,510
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from EPL (Europhysics Letters)
#2,075
of 5,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,161
of 160,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EPL (Europhysics Letters)
#21
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,482 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.