↓ Skip to main content

A New Metrics for Countries' Fitness and Products' Complexity

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
A New Metrics for Countries' Fitness and Products' Complexity
Published in
Scientific Reports, October 2012
DOI 10.1038/srep00723
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Tacchella, Matthieu Cristelli, Guido Caldarelli, Andrea Gabrielli, Luciano Pietronero

Abstract

Classical economic theories prescribe specialization of countries industrial production. Inspection of the country databases of exported products shows that this is not the case: successful countries are extremely diversified, in analogy with biosystems evolving in a competitive dynamical environment. The challenge is assessing quantitatively the non-monetary competitive advantage of diversification which represents the hidden potential for development and growth. Here we develop a new statistical approach based on coupled non-linear maps, whose fixed point defines a new metrics for the country Fitness and product Complexity. We show that a non-linear iteration is necessary to bound the complexity of products by the fitness of the less competitive countries exporting them. We show that, given the paradigm of economic complexity, the correct and simplest approach to measure the competitiveness of countries is the one presented in this work. Furthermore our metrics appears to be economically well-grounded.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 2%
Italy 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 143 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 31%
Researcher 31 20%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 32 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 38 24%
Physics and Astronomy 29 18%
Unspecified 19 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 11%
Mathematics 11 7%
Other 43 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#428,664
of 13,516,561 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#4,883
of 65,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,392
of 131,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,516,561 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them